Mr. President

So, here’s the thing: I’m so over people trying to invalidate President Obama’s leadership it’s not even funny. The reason I’m bringing this up is because a picture has been going around Facebook recently showing Obama with his hands folded in front of him while the National Anthem is being sung (poorly, I might add). He is sharing the stage with numerous other politicians who all have their hands over their hearts. 

This is the better version of the photo, but the one circulating Facebook comes from this video taken by someone in the stands.

Now let’s be clear; Obama is NOT being disrespectful standing the way he is while the anthem is sung. Has anyone ever been to a sporting event? Seriously people, next time the anthem is sung, look around. You will see people standing with their hand across their chest, some with hands folded in front, some with their hands folded behind them while they hold their hats, some with hands at their sides…this is NOT that unusual. The appropriate thing to do when the anthem is sung is to stand and remove your hat if you’re wearing one. Aside from that, there is no one specific protocol to follow like there is with the pledge. 

So can we please get over it? I understand if you don’t like his politics or still think he was born in Africa (ok, I don’t get that one, but whatever), but can we please focus on actual issues instead of terribly weak attempts at discrediting his patriotism? That would be lovely. 

Oh, and p.s., who cares if his middle name is Hussein??? Not like he really planned that.

hahahahaha

hahahahaha

positivelypersistentteach:

girlwithalessonplan:

Sandra Fluke Opening Statement (C-SPAN) (by CSPAN)

TW:  Video discusses rape victim; comments on video link very derogatory

What makes me sick about the comments on the video and the comments Rush Limbaugh made about Ms. Fluke is that this video (her statement) never once discusses recreational sex.  It talks about the medical need for birth control.  

thenewwomensmovement:

Westboro Baptist Church

3701 SW 12th St

Topeka, KS 66604

(785) 273-0325

Fred W. and Margie M. Phelps, Sr.

Westboro Baptist Church

3701 S.W. 12th Street

Topeka, Kansas 66604

phone: 785-273-0325 and 785-273-0338

fax: 785-273-9228

Fred W. Phelps. Jr. and Betty Phelps

3600 S. W. Holly…

Tags: hahahahaha

Open for questions

Was just realizing it’s been a while since I got questions. I love the conversation starters, so throw ‘em at me if you’re bored. :)

and furthermore…

please don’t tell me to “seek the truth” about homosexuality like I haven’t taken the continuing formation of my beliefs incredibly seriously. I don’t toss ideas around lightly, and quite frankly, it’s a bit insulting to have someone imply that all the thinking I’ve been doing on this prior to our conversation wasn’t me seeking the truth. Nope, that was me just idling around, mind wide open, letting everything in. Oh wait…yeah, nope, that’s not who I am. FYI, my stance on the political/legal side of same-sex marriage does not necessarily mean that you now know everything about how I view homosexuality. Finally, to assume that same-sex relationships can’t be just as loving as heterosexual relationships is absurd. If you have a heterosexual attraction, you can never assume to know what it’s like to have a same-sex attraction, and we should leave it at that. 

Ok, sorry, venting session over. Goodnight world.

To continue the conversation…

Washington state just passed legislation making same-sex marriage legal. I posted this photo on Facebook:

A friend of mine responded with two separate comments, first:

‎24 For this reason a man shall leave his father and his mother, and be joined to his wife; and they shall become one flesh.
Genesis 2:24
God shows marriage is between one MAN and one WOMAN and nothing else.

And then this:

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Corinthians+7&version=NIV

www.biblegateway.com
Concerning Married Life - Now for the matters you wrote about: It is good for a …(tharr be more)Peer into the depths

Instead of bombarding everyone that ends up getting my posts on their Facebook feed, I figured I would respond by writing my response on my blog so that people could more easily choose to skip over it if they wanted to. So, to those interested, my response is as follows:

…I understand what the Bible says. However, this is in essence a political and legal issue. The Constitution says, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…” in the first amendment. This entitles Christians to unabridged religious practices. However, it also entitles those that are not Christians to full practice of their beliefs. That means even people who do not subscribe to any specific religion at all. Banning gay marriage would effectively abridge the rights of some people to practice their personal beliefs. Christians have every right not to recognize a marriage they do not deem to be in keeping with their beliefs, but they do not have the right to force all citizens of their state or country to view those unions the same way.

The 14th amendment says, “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” The most important section to note is “no State…shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens…” and that no person should be denied “equal protection of the laws.” Basically, we can’t use the law to discriminate, even though our country has done so over and over again. Unless there is a valid reason determined through due process for why a person should have rights taken away, everyone should have the same rights and privileges. If our laws do not already make this possible, then something must change to make it possible.

I understand that many in the Christian community are concerned about the sanctity of marriage, but there’s definitely a level of hypocrisy here. We haven’t fought to make divorce illegal except for under extreme circumstances. We haven’t fought to keep the construct of marriage as the Bible describes it as a strictly Christian institution either. Marriage in its original element was meant to be a relationship be between a man, a woman, AND God. We seem to forget that one a lot. But as Christians, we haven’t had a problem when a man and a woman get married but have no relationship with God whatsoever and still call it marriage. If Christians really want to protect marriage and take it back to its original purpose, we have to go way farther back than just a few days ago when this new legislation was passed.

Essentially, we are left at this point: civil unions and marriage in Washington state grant more or less the same rights. However, the fact that certain groups could only had one option to make their commitment to one another official and legal while other groups had more than one option goes back to “separate but equal is inherently unequal.” Marriage became a secular institution just as much as a Christian institution a long time ago, so denying some groups that right is unconstitutional and should be illegal. 

Now, to step back for a moment. I completely respect the opinions of those in the Christian community who oppose gay marriage. But when thinking on this issue, keep in mind that infringing on another person’s ability to make their own decisions is one of the quickest and best ways to estrange that individual. We want to welcome ALL people into the body of Christ, and trying to control their free will, possibly before they ever even really get to know someone who follows Christ, is far from being welcoming and loving. 

God gave us His law and His Word, but He also gave us the free will to choose what we would do with it. If God gave His own creation free will, what right do we have to infringe upon the free will of others?

anticapitalist:

Incarceration In The United States

(high res)

The US is ranked #1 in some impressive areas but being #1 for incarceration isn’t something to brag about. In fact, more than 1 in every 100 adults in America are incarcerated at any given time. In some states such as Louisiana as many as 1 in 55 adults are incarcerated at any time. But even in states with fewer incarcerations like Maine, 1 in 226 are still incarcerated. In light of such numbers it isn’t surprising that the US has 25% of the world’s incarcerated population even though the US only makes up around 5% of the population globally.

Despite the huge population of incarcerated people it is far from a representative portion of the population. While the national average is 1 in 100, only 1 in 106 is a white male. Shockingly, 1 in 15 Black men are incarcerated. This is like 2 people out of every classroom. Comparatively 1 in 36 Hispanic men are incarcerated fully 300% more than their white counterparts.

(via thenewwomensmovement)